Talk:Charles Eaton (RAAF officer)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Courcelles (talk) 18:38, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

I've already looked the article over when I checked the DYK submission on this article. Let me read it again, more critically this time, and see what I think. (Of course, having already passed A-Class at MILHIST makes this seem rather backwards!) Courcelles (talk) 18:39, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * Added Melbourne.
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * DYK bit is He had seen an advertisement for the position and was the only applicant with experience of the area. and covered by citation #37. The July 1947 info is all covered by citation #38.
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * Unfortunately still the same right now, no info from reliable sources.
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Tks for review mate. As far as DYK goes, I think hooks 1 and 3 are the best anyway, the Dili job app one is the weakest IMO... BTW, if you're ready to pass as GA, ASAP would be great since I can put this in a contest round finishing at 23:59, 31 December...! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 12:11, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Tks for review mate. As far as DYK goes, I think hooks 1 and 3 are the best anyway, the Dili job app one is the weakest IMO... BTW, if you're ready to pass as GA, ASAP would be great since I can put this in a contest round finishing at 23:59, 31 December...! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 12:11, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Tks for review mate. As far as DYK goes, I think hooks 1 and 3 are the best anyway, the Dili job app one is the weakest IMO... BTW, if you're ready to pass as GA, ASAP would be great since I can put this in a contest round finishing at 23:59, 31 December...! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 12:11, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Tks for review mate. As far as DYK goes, I think hooks 1 and 3 are the best anyway, the Dili job app one is the weakest IMO... BTW, if you're ready to pass as GA, ASAP would be great since I can put this in a contest round finishing at 23:59, 31 December...! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 12:11, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

You've got GA on this article. How long it'll stay a GA I don't know- but that's only because you technically lose GA if you get this thing to FA status. Courcelles (talk) 16:32, 31 December 2009 (UTC)