Talk:Charles Heaphy/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jonas Vinther (talk · contribs) 19:24, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Very interesting article. I'll review it shortly. Jonas Vinther (speak to me!) 19:24, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Well-written Symbol support vote.svg

a. the prose is clear and concise, it respects copyright laws, and the spelling and grammar are correct

b. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation
 * The article is wonderfully written with no sentence or grammar errors.


 * Verifiable with no original research Symbol support vote.svg

a. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

b. It provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines

c. It contains no original research
 * The article mainly uses book sources but also a few online sources which all contain the necessary source or reference information.


 * Broad in its coverage Symbol support vote.svg

a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic

b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail
 * The article is broad in its coverage, stays on topic and does not go into unnecessary detail.


 * Neutral Symbol support vote.svg

It represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each
 * The article is neutral and does not include personal opinions or statements.


 * Stable Symbol support vote.svg

It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute
 * The article is stable, does not change from day to day (except edits made in preparation of GA-nomination) and is not the subject of edit wars or content disputes.


 * Illustrated Symbol support vote.svg

a. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content

b. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions
 * The article is illustrated with five images all of which are uploaded to and from Commons, and also have suitable captions.


 * Pass, fail or hold? Symbol support vote.svg
 * With the article meeting the GA-requirements I'm going to pass it. Good job people. :) Jonas Vinther (speak to me!) 20:00, 6 October 2014 (UTC)