Talk:Charles Macklin

BULK OF ARTICLE REMOVED FOR PLAGIARISM
The article, before its redactive edit, contained quotations and abounded in factual information. Despite material having been taken direct from sources, there was not a single in-line citation in the article. It is therefore a complete and clear PLAGIARISM, by any standard. Such an egregious misuse of privileged material cannot remain as a wikipedia article.

This matter was attended to cursory fashion in July 2012, and so it is clear that the elements of the problem have been known for some time. However, the peppering of the article with flags that citations are needed, while nobel for its effort in this case, is an example of placing plasters on a gaping tumorous growth, and is insufficient.

Please do not reverse this redaction, without discussion at high level. It is a continuing embarrassment to wikipedia (and detrimental to its impact) that such practices are not dealt with firmly and consistently. LeProf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.201.123.248 (talk) 16:32, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 11:19, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charles Macklin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160110201012/http://charlesmacklin.ie/ to http://www.charlesmacklin.ie/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:02, 21 December 2017 (UTC)