Talk:Charles Nelson Pogue

I built and tested the Pogue carburetor in 1957
When I was a Senior at UCLA in Engineering in the summer of 1957, I built and tested the Pogue carburetor for my Senior Project in the "Senior Engineering Laboratory" class. I tested the carburetor on an old Ford V-8 engine from the 1930's. The results were a disappointment as the efficiency at best was only a few percent better than a conventional carburetor. My report was filed in the Engineering Library at ULCA, but years later when I requested to see it, they could not find it. I made no copy of it, partly because copying then was more expensive and partly due to the negative results. Another problem was that no money was available to finance the project and there was no way to measure the fuel/air ratio although I was able to vary it without knowing what the numerical values were. David S. Lawyer 21:30, 25 February 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dlawyer (talk • contribs)

Using vapor instead of spraying liquid into a piston seems logical if you want more efficiency. Strange no one with money wants to invest in this - probably needs some engineering to get the most out of it. Most of the gas going out the tailpipe is old hat. The political balance between the environment, the driving public and the oil industry must be hard ( only joking, oil will win this easy.) 75.68.248.198 (talk) 04:22, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Charles Nelson Pogue. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090301024450/http://www.mikebrownsolutions.com:80/fish3.htm to http://www.mikebrownsolutions.com/fish3.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:54, 20 November 2016 (UTC)