Talk:Charles and Arthur Wilson

Split articles?
Should this page be split into two entries or should it be merged with Thomas Wilson Sons & Co.? There are a few points made that generalise between the two of them when i think they are only relevent to one or the other brother. There are some staues on the streest of Hull to Thomas and possibly Charles or Arthur, perhaps someone can get a picture to use? Dr.Rock72


 * I agree that this page should be split as some of the information is suspect and because both men deserve individual entries. No idea where you would find a photo of a statue unless you visited Hull. There doesn't seemt o be a proper entry for Thomas Wilson either which is puzzling as he is a more prominent figure and mentioned several times in various articles, the business being named after him. Pirate Jon


 * I have formatted the page a little and set it up to include individual biogrpahies, if these are completed thouroughly then perhaps the page would be ready to be split. Pirate Jon

Hull maritime project
This page is part of a WikiProject that links all artciles relating to Hull's maritime history in this period. Hull Maritime Project

Picture
I did find a good political cartoon of Charles in his political role but not been able to secure copyright infomration or permission to actually upload it. Mr. Lizard

Articles split 8th April 2007
Both Charles and Arthur Wilson now have their own pages, and this page now serves as a disambiguation page. All internal and external links have been added to the individual articles, and the Background section of the original article is already detailed in the article Thomas Wilson Sons & Co. Peter symonds 18:16, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The only reason for not deleting the accompanying main-namespace page is the likely external existence of copies of it or lks to it. It may have had to be a Dab immediately after the split, but in any case, the pair as a topic are almost certainly adequately dealt with in Thomas Wilson Sons & Co., which BTW does the same job the Dab has been offering to do (for whom?) by lk'g to both of them in two sentences of about 60 words. I have bypassed the two main-namespace uses of the so-called Dab, each with a pair of lks, as their context calls for. Any future attention to the pg of that title will be adequately served by the Rdr i'm creating to the sec'n i mentioned in the second of these four sentences. --Jerzy•t 23:01, 30 April 2010 (UTC)