Talk:Charlie Haas/Archive 1

Return to WWE
There seems to be a conflict with Haas' Return to WWE section.

I try to post the following: ''During a feud between Rob Van Dam and Shelton Benjamin, it was decided Benjamin's match on the April 17, 2006 edition of Monday Night Raw would determine the prize of their upcoming match at Backlash. Both men agreed RVD would select Benjamin's opponent. To Benjamin's surprise, a returning Charlie Haas was selected. Benjamin was shocked as his former partner took it to him in a great match; Benjamin began to gain the upper hand which was his downfall as it lead to arrogance until he was quickly pinned by a jackknife pin.''

And it is continuously replaced with a more plain revision along the lines of: ''Haas returned on April 17, after RVD was allowed to choose Benjamin's opponent. Haas quickly got the upper hand, but Shelton fought back. At the end of a great match, Haas eventually got the pin.''

I really don't see any reason why the latter is superior to the former. The former is more elaborate and detailed, which I think is important to Haas' return match. Moreover, these details explain why RVD was choosing an opponent for Benjamin; without the explanation it's a little random. If anyone wants to change the article, please explain your reasons here. WikiFew 18:00, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Etiquette says the first person to post accurate details has the right to the post. I posted well before you.


 * That's not true at all. The whole point of Wikipedia is a collaboration of information from people.  I don't think anyone agrees that the first person to post gets exclusive rights to edit.  That's moronic.WikiFew 22:16, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

You are leaving out the fact about the info being accurate. Wikipedia is not about making changes over ego's sake and for the sake of making changes. If someone already has accurate info that does NOT require editing, you need to leave it alone as do I and everyone else.


 * This is a pointless arguement. The fact is Wikipedia is a collaboration, which is exactly what I said.  I was simply adding to what you wrote and you're turning this into an ego issue in a poorly crafted straw man arguement in an attempt to make me look like the foolish one.  You being the one proclaiming if you're here first, you have exclusive rights, which echoes eerily of the childish proclamation "finders keepers, losers weepers."WikiFew 05:29, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

You're right you're pointless so was the way you rewrote what I originally wrote. Enjoy it.


 * Right. That's exactly what I said.  I think this has done no more than prove you're immature and, to be frank, moronic.  I don't think there's any arguement that, at least in a debate between you and I on this subject, I won as you have provided no actual arguement or anything intelligent to say.WikiFew 18:40, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

the wrestling hobo
charlie haas looks odd not being clean-shaven anymore

Do we have a better picture of Hass. He looks way different now. User:Killswitch Engage -- — Preceding undated comment added May 8, 2006

Movelist
To my knowledge, he has only ever attempted to do the Angle Slam once, and failed. That would hardly count as a finisher.

I'm going to take this off, but if someone can tell me other instances in which he used it, then I'll let it stay, though I dunno about it as a finisher either.

I believe he used it a bit in Indy promotions, but I agree, it doesn't really qualify as a "Finisher" -- Tahngarth

I can sit with that, ti was I who added it. Anyway eh used it in an indy match with AJ Styles, Samoa Joe, and Christopher Daniels. He did and arm-twist before hand but I'm pretty sure it was glorified and he went for the pin, but I could be wrong. --Ben Tokyo — Preceding undated comment added April 3, 2007

Haas's Legal Name
According to the Texas Department of Public Safety (the issuer of Driver Licenses for the State of Texas) Haas's legal name is "Charles Doyle Haas II", This can be verified via the website publicdata.comftw_420 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ftw 420 (talk • contribs) 05:45, 23 April 2007 (UTC).

Fair use rationale for Image:Charlie haas on raw.jpg
Image:Charlie haas on raw.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:06, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 03:32, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Break up of WGTT
With Shelton Benjamin now an ECW superstar, its pretty obvious that Haas is once again going to be a singles wrestler and the Worlds Greatest Tag Team is once again over —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.253.117.243 (talk) 22:23, 23 November 2007 (UTC) Does anyone know why they broke up WGTT(after all they were tag team of the year before)? — Preceding undated comment added June 5, 2008