Talk:Charlotte Lawrence

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because the article asserts significance or importance of the subject as an actress and model. I'm on the fence as to whether this article subject meets Wikipedia's notability standards, but I believe the proper process here would be articles for deletion rather than speedy deletion. Knope7 (talk) 01:58, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (your reason here) --Wikisempra (talk) 10:10, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Charlotte has millions of views on YouTube. Although this is not relevant according to the Wikipedia guideline, she’s also verified in her Facebook, Twitter and Instagram account, something that shows a sign of popularity. She has been included in magazine articles over the last 3 years, including Vogue, Fendi, teenVogue, Harpers Bazaar and she’s also backed by IMG and Spotify itself.

great-great-great grandfather's endeavors
Explain how it is necessary to include anything else beyond her great-great-great grandfather's name? He literally has his own article on Wikipedia. Piling up random information seems added by a fan --89.172.110.204 (talk) 16:55, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
 * You're supposed to discuss before reverting. Its relevant because the hospital and school have their own articles so readers may want to visit those links rather than go the relative's page, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 20:14, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
 * The great grandfather's article has all the links to those articles. Why would an average reader be interested to click on those articles about the hospital and the school from her page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.136.86.218 (talk) 18:01, 16 January 2020 (UTC)