Talk:Charter for Compassion

Notable? or a Candidate for Deletion?
This appears to be a vanity project for Ms Armstrong and has made no impact at all on the real world. Why is the article even here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.225.21.78 (talk) 06:39, 28 December 2009 (UTC)


 * true Akp8 (talk) 10:08, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Charter and creative commons license
I have emailed the org. to see if they have released the charter under a creative commons license. It makes sense they would do so, but until i can get evidence for that, we should not reprint more than small sections of the charter here.(mercurywoodrose)50.193.19.66 (talk) 16:48, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

This is clearly a promotional piece for the organization, not an objective article. RavenVert (talk) 00:14, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

POV
This article seems to be written like an advertisement for this organization. It is clearly not from a neutral POV. In my opinion, it needs to be either completely rewritten with an entirely different tone (and fewer hyperlinks to this thing's own website) or deleted (I don't know if it's even notable enough to have its own article). ImperialSaponification (talk) 03:12, 9 January 2024 (UTC)