Talk:Charyn Ash Grove

Merge into Charyn National Park?
The subject doesn't seem notable enough to warrant its own article, but a summary of the contents (heavily edited and condensed, mind) could probably be incorporated into Charyn National Park, expanding a short section on the same (?) subject already there. That would also get around this article's title, which is both convoluted and confusing. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:30, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi That could work, I don't recall I've ever done a Merge and delete as the most common merge creates a redirect.  It does look like it's possible for race situatuions under AfD: "At Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, when an editor wishes for an article to be merged to another article but does not regard the article's title as a useful redirect, the editor sometimes suggests something like, "Merge and delete"." The issues are, 1) this (and some other similar articles by the user who created it) are mostly fluff, non-encyclopedic prose style writing, and npov issues without many new facts and no references/citations to add to any larger article. There does seem to be a mention of the Charyn Ash Grove in Charyn National Park article but I'm not sure we can merge much info from this article to that for the reasons I just mentioned.  2) The long, confusing title is useless for a typical merge and redirect further supporting a deletion prod or delete and merge. Bhockey10 (talk) 19:34, 10 March 2020 (UTC)