Talk:Chatham House

Ref for pro-establishment
Although it has been alleged that Chatham House reflects a pro-establishment view of the world

This really does need to be sourced however common a belief it might be
 * Added a reference (British foreign policy establishment). Thincat 13:14, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

photo caption
Reagan and Thatcher are described as 'at right'. The conventional English expression is 'on the right', which describes not only their photo position, but also their political position. Pamour (talk) 08:28, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Chatham House. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121016114958/http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/news-204888-gul-winner-of-prestigious-chatham-house-award.html to http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/news-204888-gul-winner-of-prestigious-chatham-house-award.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:20, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

User:Rafaellacj and User:Nickcapeling both work for Chatham House
Hi

I think this article needs someone independent to review it, two major contributors User:Rafaellacj and User:Nickcapeling both work for Chatham House (see their user pages). Currently the article currently reads a bit like an advert....

Thanks

John Cummings (talk) 10:29, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Please can someone help review this? My contribution was to bring the page up to date in terms of reports from Chatham House over the past couple of years and to remove an old citation which no longer exists online. I don't feel these changes are controversial but I would prefer this to be resolved one way or another rather than have this notice posted onto it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nickcapeling (talk • contribs) 23:08, 27 February 2019 (UTC)


 * I am wondering if the publications even belong on Wikipedia outside of perhaps a bibliography section? I am thinking that the publications need to be shown as notable, not merely as existing. AmplifyWiki (talk) 17:16, 30 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Agreed - I have boldly removed them Lyndaship (talk) 18:06, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I appreciate the changes made, but please can the page be reverted back so it does not include the messages about paid content etc at the top. I am very happy to submit suggested changes for consideration instead of direct edits, but i have been waiting for months for one of the wiki editors to revert the page back. Please can someone help urgently? comment added by Nickcapeling 17:01, 04 September 2019 (UTC)

Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:32, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Abdalla Hamdok at Chatham House.jpg
 * CHPrize-0157.jpg
 * Chatham House London Conference 2019.jpg
 * Katrín Jakobsdóttir December 2019.jpg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:53, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Chatham-house-logo.png

Outdated logo
Hi all, I made some edits to the article – mainly updates about the old director Robin Niblett and adding details about how long the journals have been running for. I noticed the logo is the old one. I think they changed it in the last couple of years. I have a feeling their brand guidelines are public, I can have a look for them. As a relative newbie though, what are the main considerations to replace the image (e.g. sourcing, format, quality, copyright)? I'm guessing there must be an article on this – I would welcome a steer! KTnow (talk) 12:31, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Here is a link to a tutorial which may help. Burrobert (talk) 12:46, 6 June 2023 (UTC)