Talk:Chau Say Tevoda/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 04:52, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I will be reviewing this. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 04:52, 29 June 2016 (UTC)


 * General
 * No copyvio/external link trouble
 * Dablink: Nagas
 * Done
 * Use italics for non-English terms
 * Done wherever required. Wikilinked names are not given in italics
 * Lead
 * pre – dates the former and post – dates Use hyphens not spaced endashes
 * Done
 * mid – 12th century hyphen not spaced endash
 * Done
 * 2000 – 2009 Unspaced endash not spaced endash (also in History)
 * Done
 * History
 * built in the 12th century In the lead you said "mid-12th"
 * Chnaged
 * Further supplementation of structures were done "was", not "were"
 * Yes, done
 * Features
 * Many of the sculptures are in a fairly good condition and are of Vishnu Change to "Many of the sculptures depict Vishnu, and are in a fairly good condition"
 * Better wording. Done
 * Nature has contributed to further deterioration resulting from the collapse of the ceiling Not sure what it means. If I am right this should be rephrased to "With time the ceiling has collapsed and led to further deterioration"
 * Replaced as suggested
 * The Chau Say Tevoda was in a dilapidated state Simply say "The temple was...."
 * Done


 * Thanks for the review. I have addressed all review comments. Please see if I need to address any more issues.  Nvvchar . 05:58, 29 June 2016 (UTC)