Talk:Chebychev–Grübler–Kutzbach criterion

Revisions to this article
I wrote the section on mobility for the article linkage (mechanical) before I saw this article. I copied that section here and revised the wording. I believe this is better than what was here previously, though it may be somewhat duplicative. Prof McCarthy (talk) 16:28, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Notational crudities
I found this:
 * M=6(N-1)

I changed it to this:
 * M = 6(N − 1)

Of course the idea is to match TeX style as closely as possible. See WP:MOSMATH Michael Hardy (talk) 04:18, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
 * The digits 6 and 1 and the parentheses should not be italicized. One does not indiscriminately italicize everything in non-TeX mathematical notation. One italicizes variables.
 * And the minus sign is not a stubby little hyphen.
 * And proper spacing is called for.