Talk:Checkmate (1911 film)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: The Almightey Drill (talk · contribs) 07:14, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

I will review this. &#39;&#39;&#39;tAD&#39;&#39;&#39; (talk) 07:14, 3 September 2015 (UTC)


 * 1) It is well-written. Minor copy-edit done, nothing incredibly serious
 * 2) It is verified. The plot has sources because the film is lost. Nothing is outlandish and claimed without source, nor is there original research. Analysis is taken from a historian
 * 3) It is broad in its coverage inasmuch as can be for a lost film. These articles do not to be long, only fitting into criteria. The quality and scope of the article is not dissimilar to How Brown Saw the Baseball Game, a Featured Article
 * 4) No hard bias comes out from this article, it admits to the spectrum of views by contemporary critics. It would be ideal to include opponents of the Lonergan authorship hypothesis, but I admit that it is a) very likely he wrote it and b) there are few notable scholars on such a subject
 * 5) Stability is no problem
 * 6) Images are relevant, as are their captions. Both are public domain from being over a century old. I added an image of the only known credited person, which I believe to be entirely relevant to our imagination of a lost film.

As you can see, we have a pass &#39;&#39;&#39;tAD&#39;&#39;&#39; (talk) 07:36, 3 September 2015 (UTC)