Talk:Cheddar, Somerset/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   18:52, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Comments are based on this version.


 * General
 * You appear to have a dead link.
 * Replaced.&mdash; Rod talk 09:10, 4 March 2011 (UTC)


 * lead
 * It seems quite short given the size of the article. I think it needs expanding if it's to be a proper summary of the article
 * I have expanded the lead to bring in some of the other aspects covered in the article to provide a better summary.&mdash; Rod talk 22:01, 4 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Titles of publications (like The Independent) should be italicised
 * I've italicised The Independent but couldn't spot any others.&mdash; Rod talk 09:10, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * newspaper= parameter now used which should resolve these.&mdash; Rod talk 10:54, 4 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Government
 * I don't think a PDF from the parish council's website is a reliable source for Cheddar's village status—you'll need a secondary source
 * I've added a county council source for this, but not sure if more/better are needed. Thryduulf (talk) 17:46, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The source for Axbridge's town status is a tourist website and doesn't look reliable to me
 * Other, more reliable sources added.
 * Most of the second paragraph is sourced to the minutes of a parish council meeting—not a good source for the council's responsibilities
 * It had previously been part of Axbridge Rural District, which is responsible...?
 * Reworded & clarified old & new authorities and their responsibilities.&mdash; Rod talk 09:10, 4 March 2011 (UTC)


 * The whole of the stuff on Somerset County Council is sourced to a page on the fire brigade's website which doesn't even mention it
 * The penultimate paragraph is completely unsourced
 * Another editor has added a range of secondary sources to this paragraph.&mdash; Rod talk 22:01, 4 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Geography
 * Citation 36 doesn't look like a reliable source
 * Replaced with British Geological Survey which is more reliable.&mdash; Rod talk 10:54, 4 March 2011 (UTC)


 * I put a fact tag under the SSSI heading, the material isn't covered by the citation at the end of the paragraph
 * Ref added. Jaguar (talk) 12:16, 5 March 2011 (UTC)


 * What is citation 43? If it's a book, it needs an ISBN
 * I've asked for more info from the editor who added this reference.&mdash; Rod talk 09:10, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * This was a self published book with no ISBN - I have replaced it with the SSSI citation sheet which had the same info.&mdash; Rod talk 11:25, 5 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Last sentence under SSSI needs a ref
 * Refs added for National Trust & Somerset Wildlife Trust.&mdash; Rod talk 10:54, 4 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Demography
 * This is a very short section. Can the material not be merged elsewhere?


 * Landmarks
 * I've left another fact tag at the end of the section
 * Ref added. Jaguar (talk) 12:10, 5 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Transport
 * Another fact tag
 * Referenced.&mdash; Rod talk 10:54, 4 March 2011 (UTC)


 * How far is cheddar from the M5?
 * Added&mdash; Rod talk 10:54, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

All in all, a very nice article into which a lot of work has gone. Most of the points are minor and can hopefully be addressed relatively easily. I'll put the GA nomination on hold to allow a chance to make the fixes. HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   21:36, 3 March 2011 (UTC)


 * In light of the progress made over the last few days, I'm happy to pass this GA review. Congratulations and excellent work. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   19:02, 5 March 2011 (UTC)