Talk:Cheeseburger in Paradise (restaurant)

WP:FOOD Tagging
This article talk page was automatically added with WikiProject Food and drink banner as it falls under Category:Restaurants or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. You can find the related request for tagging here -- TinucherianBot (talk) 08:43, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Photo needed
Found (and added) a photo of the Lahaina, Hawaii restaurant, which is not affiliated with the chain named named after the Jimmy Buffet song, according to the article. Still need a photo of one of the chain restaurants, so I left the request photo tag. Geoff TC 22:01, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Found and added a photo of the Indiana location. Geoff TC 20:33, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

"Costa Rican Steak Wrap"
Just how is this island themed? Or have they moved Costa Rica? Peridon (talk) 22:06, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * As there's been no answer, I've removed it from the list. Peridon (talk) 19:38, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Potential COI problem
I've just tagged the article with a COI template because I've been noting a fair amount of material with a distinctly promotional tone being added to it, by an editor with the user name "Cheeseburgerinparadise2002". Until this potential conflict of interest problem is cleared up, I'd like to ask that editor to please stop adding material to the article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 19:21, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Potential issues with "neutrality"
Deconstructhis- I apologize for not creating my own little section to comment back, I'm not sure on how to do that. What material is promotional looking to you? I'm sure that some of it is, I'm just looking for a way to make it more neutral. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cheeseburgerinparadise2002 (talk • contribs) 19:25, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey Cheeseburgerinparadise2002, no problem at all; a completely new section wasn't even necessary really but I'll start one for clarity sake. Thanks for getting back to me. I'll get back to you with specifics later on tonight or early tomorrow, regarding some specific suggestions; if the material hasn't already been edited by someone else. In the meantime, I'd like to suggest that you visit and perhaps make a comment there. I apologise for not informing you of that discussion earlier. Thanks again for your response; have a good evening.  cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 20:42, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Hello CBIP back again, I just finished reading the specifics of your edits (the "theme" section) and it doesn't look good.. I noticed that your account was pulled because it was deemed to be for "promotional purposes", and frankly I have to agree with that perspective. To be honest with you, in my opinion, it reads like a puff promotional piece on a restaurant, that you might find in an in-flight airline magazine. If you're asking me to fill you in on how to write promotional material for your firm that will pass muster as "genuine" Wikipedia content; I'm forced to ask exactly how many free cheeseburgers are in it for me? Just kidding guys, just kidding. In all seriousness; I'd like to suggest to you, that if you're trying to head along that road, you've chosen a difficult undertaking; spam is taken quite seriously around here and in my opinion justifiably so. Read, take it to heart, and proceed from there.  cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 04:39, 18 March 2010 (UTC)