Talk:Chelsea (song)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: HĐ (talk · contribs) 11:33, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Lead ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅
 * "It was issued to" → sent to
 * "features a melody, similar to that of" → a melody that is similar to...
 * "generally mixed reviews" → mixed reviews only
 * Link music critics
 * music critics, who
 * "who compared it to the works of Gwen Stefani and Blondie, but found it to be a "weak" debut single" → the two clauses do not have opposite meanings/claims, what's with the "but" conjunction?

Composition ✅ ✅ ✅
 * "late 80s and 90s" → 1980s and 1990s
 * "ode to jealousy, begin[ning] with [a] Eurhythmics-style synth before launching into a snarling, almost-tough chorus." → try to paraphrase this claim
 * The Billboard review says it is a bubblegum song, perhaps bubblegum pop?

Commercial reception ✅ ✅ ✅
 * After its release, "Chelsea" was moderately successful → "After its release" sounds superfluous
 * "faired" → you mean "fared"?
 * was able to peak → weird wording


 * The rest of the article: short, concise, and well crafted
 * for seven days. P.s. Could you mind having a look at this GAN? Thanks — Simon (talk) 09:28, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I have replied to all of your concerns and changed the article accordingly. Thank you so much for the review! Carbrera (talk) 03:22, 14 May 2016 (UTC)