Talk:Chemistry (relationship)

Section (originally had no section title)
>this is a well documented concept. Um, it may be the technical writer in me, but this could be improved. I suggest 'often reported' as a partial solution. You cannot just say 'well documented' and then not provided the documentation. You also cannot assume that the reader has this experience. I realize it may be a bit like describing pineapple to someone who has never eaten one but this paragraph needs some building.

>While the actual definition of chemistry, its components, and its manifestations are fairly vague, this is a well documented concept.

Agreed. Unicorns are a well documented concept and they're not real. This article probably needs to live inside the Love article. I vote to strike it and merge the content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.157.173.237 (talk) 18:02, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Suggestions
The first link needs to be fixed. When I clicked the first link, I was directed to the general yahoo home page.

Also, you mentioned about the Western Society view of the chemistry. I think it would be beneficial to add other societies views of chemistry in the beginning stages of relationships.

It would also be beneficial to give define and give examples of the different kinds of chemistries instead of only providing a list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lovejonespink (talk • contribs) 03:40, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chemistry (relationship). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120307011828/http://passion101.com/blog/2010/07/the-3-c%E2%80%99s-of-relationship-chemistry-compatibility-commitment/ to http://passion101.com/blog/2010/07/the-3-c%E2%80%99s-of-relationship-chemistry-compatibility-commitment/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:02, 4 August 2017 (UTC)