Talk:Chen Quanguo

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chen Quanguo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130116182348/http://leaders.people.com.cn/GB/10487050.html to http://leaders.people.com.cn/GB/10487050.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:44, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Read template for source of info
Hi. There seems to be pretty serious misinterpretation on a revert explaination : the source of info is the page's template of exhaustive information, if it wasn't read before. A retraction of the misinterpretation would be a good faith sign @ that the misinterpretation was a simple error. Thanks. Pasdecomplot (talk) 14:16, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Expanded sections
"Career" was expanded into different sections, per BLPN. Any thoughts about joining "Henan and Hebei" into a section instead of two separate sections? Thanks. Pasdecomplot (talk) 20:38, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

draconian
, my concern was that the assertion was sourced in the lead to a first-person piece. If the assertion is adequately sourced in the section, I'd prefer we move a better source to the lead or simply remove this source. I don't think we can source that assertion to the source it seems to be cited to. —valereee (talk) 17:29, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
 * In editing, one can revert, or examine the merits of the edit one might have some reservations about. Mere removal does not help, though it saves time (for one editor, while wasting the time of the other), as opposed to examining the point in depth. One doesn't need the relevant sections to appreciate that Chen Quanguo had, wherever he has authority, resulted in draconian measures. I haven't checked the text but his fanatical insistence, for example, that Tibetans desiring to be married be married off to Han-people is an egregious instance of hardline implementation of a racial policy designed to marry out people of Tibetan descent, and, at the same time, ensure that the Han component sees to it that Chinese is spoken at home and Tibetan - a language with a magnificent plurimillenial literature - be extinguished. This and many other repulsive policies are well known to area experts, and what the Uyghur woman stated is a cliohé. The Uyghurs liken him to Wang Chen (王震) whom our wiki bio doesn't tell much about: he was the sadist who, back in the early fifties in Xinjiang domineered an incident where a Han soldier boiled pork in public in a Muslim village and was killed by one or two outraged villagers, retaliated by placing a lockdown on the town, shooting the ostensible culprits in the village square and then, after cooking several pigs, forcing all of the Muslim inhabitants at gunpoint to swallow pieces of pigmeat. Do what you like, but don't remove the substance of what is obvious and widely sourced. If you want shift her testimony downpage  It is not collaborative simply to wipe out material that is congruent with the topic. That scars the text as it spurns the work of those who edit it, who have some knowledge of the topic area.Nishidani (talk) 18:19, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

her “testimony” seems nothing but lies and falsehood. does anyone really believe thatRJS001 (talk) 22:19, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

December 25, 2021
What happened on December 25, 2021? Please update the article. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 17:37, 25 December 2021 (UTC)