Talk:Chen Yidan

Copy
This article may require copy editing for grammar, style, cohesion, tone, or spelling. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CCI2017 (talk • contribs) 12:13, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 22 March 2017

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: page moved. —C.Fred (talk) 17:39, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Chen yihan → Chen Yidan – someone had previously created Chen Yidan, but made mistakes with copyright violations and tonality of the article. Consequently, this got deleted and blocked from recreation. The original author made a somewhat better attempt under a wrong name Chen yihan which I then tried to improve further with references and removal of controversial language. The article still needs some work, but I definitely think the person is noteworthy as key figure of one of China's biggest internet companies and emerging major philanthropist. See references that have been added. Thx. Jake Brockman (talk) 11:45, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Support and quickly. In ictu oculi (talk) 21:25, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Obvious move. Problems that led to protection of this title not applicable in this version, so I have boldly moved. —C.Fred (talk) 17:39, 26 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Tags
I have made edits addressing the conflict of interest tags at the top of the page, but wanted to see if anyone had further information or input as to a reason for keeping the flags? I want to make sure there is a consensus before determining if they continue to be necessary, or if others want to work on it more. Oscar Newburg Thermidor (talk) 23:16, 17 April 2019 (UTC)


 * They need to stay, as the article is still subject to conflict of interest editing. Please, this is not fooling anyone. Stop spamming Wikipedia. Citobun (talk) 06:43, 19 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi User:Citobun, I appreciate your response, and did expect to encounter this kind of suspicion on such pages in that this appears to be a particularly difficult part of Wikipedia-thus why I am interested in it! From what I have seen in watching other similar situations, there is deference given to the user that posts the banner, and that they should be consulted in any discussion of it and even given the final decision. To that end, I believe that I have reviewed the page and tried to cut out anything that appears promotional to me or otherwise inappropriate. I also looked at the rather bad sources used and tried to replace them with better ones. Can you please review the page to let me know if there are further concerns about the material that was posted by the users that had a conflict of interest? No need to be specific; this entry was pretty bad when I came across it. Or are you saying that you believe that the banners should be permanent? I had not heard that before, but am interested in the concept. Oscar Newburg Thermidor (talk) 22:21, 21 April 2019 (UTC)