Talk:Chennai Super Kings/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Resolute (talk · contribs) 01:07, 3 December 2011 (UTC)


 * General
 * Images are good
 * Sources require formatting
 * Several sections missing citations, or are completely unsourced.
 * References 12, 14, 18, 19, 22, 37 and at least one "scorecard" link is dead:
 * Reference 4 is already marked as not supporting the statement it is citing.

Unfortunately, I am left with little choice but to fail this nomination at this time. The article is on its way, but the referencing is quite deficient and will need some time to be brought up to par. There are are numerous dead links - and it seems likely that the remaining ESPN Cricinfo links will go dead at some point in the future, so I would strongly recommend archiving the existing (and future) such links at http://www.webcitation.org/ (including the scorecard links, if you intend to keep game-by-game summaries local to this article). Most references are just bare citations and need more information, please see WP:CITE. There are statements throughout the article that are not cited at all, including (for instance), the entire 2011 Champions League Twenty20 section. Overall, once all of this is corrected, I would suggest that this article go to peer review for a copyedit. But please keep at it, and good luck! Regards, Resolute 01:07, 3 December 2011 (UTC)