Talk:Cheomseongdae

Umm...
...how exactly is that picture supposed to show me how the Cheomseongdae was used? -- Visviva 15:01, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I took a new one last week. Enjoy. ZsinjTalk 14:41, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Oldest surviving Observatory in East Asia
It should re-written to be oldest surviving Observatory in East Asia.--Korsentry 01:46, 17 March 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by KoreanSentry (talk • contribs)

WP:WEASEL
This article has pervasive use of uncited information supported by vague assertions like "Some claim..." "Some scholars have argued..." etc. &mdash;Notyourbroom ( talk ) 06:49, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Cheomseongdae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060222141500/http://www.lifeinkorea.com:80/Travel2/kyongju/193 to http://www.lifeinkorea.com/Travel2/kyongju/193

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:47, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Korea-Gyeongju-Cheomseongdae-02.jpg to appear as POTD soon
Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Korea-Gyeongju-Cheomseongdae-02.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on December 23, 2017. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2017-12-23. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 08:31, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Improving the article
Hi everyone, I'll be working on improving and expanding this article today and in the next coming days. Hopefully Cheomseongdae can be upgraded from its current Start-Class rating, and, if possible, could be nominated for a DYK if there's enough material to expand it five-fold. Cheers! Brinacor (talk) 18:17, 1 May 2018 (JST)