Talk:Cherubikon

Addition of the history of the monodic cherouvikon
I added the history according to the earliest sources with musical notation. But this concerns the monodic version.

There is still missing a discussion of the Slavic sources and the development of a polyphonic transmission.—Platonykiss (talk) 07:36, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Text section
Please stop to mess it up constantly according to very doubtful conventions (like modernising letters of a medieval poem), most of the texts here follow local sources and have to be quoted precisely in every respect, even if they do not follow common standards. This is not teamwork, it is a nightmare! There is also someone who is complaining about links to youtube. Please note that this article had a particular positive resonance due to the integration of fieldwork made of traditional singers, and there is nothing “unholy” about it. There is youtube and here is wikipedia (take it or leave it!). Platonykiss (talk) 00:20, 8 March 2020 (UTC)