Talk:Cheshire murders/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.'' Reviewer: AGK  [&bull; ] 12:56, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for criteria)

Engaging and tightly-written, and covers all the bases of the subject matter. A definite plus is how well the article deals with the subject in a neutral way: it'd be easy to sensationalise the topic.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Everything referenced fine. Reliable sources for these topics are limited mainly to news stories (it takes a good decade for most crimes to make it into academic literature and at least five for journals, monthlies, etc.) so that's not a worry here.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Covers everything well.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * No licensing problems. Image usage is sparing but adequate.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * No licensing problems. Image usage is sparing but adequate.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Happy to grant this article GA status. AGK [&bull; ] 12:56, 28 January 2011 (UTC)