Talk:Chesterfield, Derbyshire/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: 12george1 (talk) 02:22, 31 March 2011 (UTC)


 * General
 * Look for any place in the article that is missing citations, there is so many that I cannot list all of them here.
 * Lead
 * Wikilink England, miles, and km.
 * History
 * It looks like you split the first and second incorrectly, since you have information about the 1204 charter split up.
 * ✅ - Merged part of second paragraph with the first. Schumi  555  09:34, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Borough council
 * Wikilink the term "Liberal Democrat" to the political party of that country, because I am from USA and "Liberal Democrat" has a totally different definition here as compared to UK.
 * ✅ Schumi  555  09:34, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * ...1 and 3 councillors elected for each ward" - Spell-out 1 and 3
 * ✅ Schumi  555  09:34, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Economy
 * "The Institute of Business Advisers]" - Why is there a bracket there?
 * "The Chesterfield and North Derbyshire Branch]" - Same thing
 * ✅ - Removed both brackets. Schumi  555  09:34, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * What does "CPP" stands for?
 * ✅ Added wikilink to the relevant page. Schumi  555  09:34, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Town centre (under "Shopping, entertainment and leisure")
 * The Pavements (under "Shopping, entertainment and leisure")
 * "Queens park is a popular attraction where you can go swimming diving, gymnastics and tennis it does have a park as well with a train for the little kids to go one and there is also a boating lake." - This sounds like an advertisement.
 * ✅ - Removed this sentence. The Park is mentioned in the sports and leisure section. Schumi  555  09:34, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Sports and leisure
 * "consists of nine divisions and 3 cup competitions." - Spell-out 3
 * ✅ Schumi  555  09:34, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * References
 * Several references are just bare URLs and/or not in the CiteWeb or CiteNews, and also missing information like the author, publisher, date, and accessdates. Those references are: #1, #14-#27, #30-#35, #37, and #39-#59.
 * Several references are just bare URLs and/or not in the CiteWeb or CiteNews, and also missing information like the author, publisher, date, and accessdates. Those references are: #1, #14-#27, #30-#35, #37, and #39-#59.


 * ✅  Rcsprinter  Gimme a message  20:04, 7 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Since you did not address or fix the problem I had with the lead (shortness; in agreement with Bob Castle's suggestion) and references, I have no choice but to fail this nomination. I gave you a week and a half to fix this, but it was not fixed/addressed. You may try again later when these outstanding issues have been fixed.--12george1 (talk) 00:13, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Please don't link England, miles and km.-- Beloved Freak  08:25, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Non-reviewer comments

The lead paragraph needs to summarise the content of the article - ideally, they should be at least two paragraphs long. Bob talk 09:48, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Date formats need to be consistent in the references section there are, day first, month first & ISO formats at the moment. Keith D (talk) 12:24, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

I've made some copyedits on errors and corrected some things.  Rcsprinter  Gimme a message   09:42, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I just need you to make sure there are citations throughout the article, and also revise the article per Bob and Keith D's suggestions.--12george1 (talk) 20:17, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Good work
This article is looking good. Well done. If you need to meet to discuss then you know about this. Victuallers (talk) 00:12, 3 April 2011 (UTC)