Talk:Chetan Bhagat/Archive 1

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 17:38, 9 November 2001 (UTC)

The article is poorly written.His writings has been not even considered by major newspapers for criticism and the few critics who chose to write have rated it poorly.This has not been mentioned in the summary.Also a large section is written as individual opinions which are not sourced and hence should be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arun george85 (talk • contribs) 20:57, 14 October 2009 (UTC) Hi, I've re-written most of the article because neutral every sentence was poorly constructed, and failed to adhere to Wikipedia's NPOV standards. Please provide citations where required. Sigbhu (talk • contribs)

Copyright problem removed
One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:25, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problem
This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --Whpq (talk) 19:47, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Encyclopedic style and content
Some portions of the article use an excessively eulogizing tone, and several portions of the article seem to be copied from other sites. A thorough review to correct these faults is required. Apoorv020 (talk) 18:09, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

NPOV tag should be removed
Its been more than one year since it was tagged for NPOV. Since than there has been significant contribution on this page to meet wiki standards.I think there's no need of this tag.Requesting all other editors to access it and decide for Neutrality. So that tag can be removed.--Sandy (talk) 21:14, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I also feel so and removed the tag! In addition, I feel the refimprove tag can be removed too adding few inline cn tags! --Tito Dutta (contact)

Bhagat's article in The Guardian?
I couldn't find any article in The Guardian published or written by Mr. Bhagat. On the contrary, I found articles criticizing his writing style 12. I'm removing that statement from the article. -- Obloid cow (talk) 03:06, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Should this be changed?
Hi! The head of the page says, "In 2008, The New York Times cited Bhagat as "the biggest selling English language novelist in India’s history". However, as per the reference, "But he has also become the biggest-selling English-language novelist in India’s history, according to his publisher, Rupa & Company, one of India’s oldest and best established publishers." So, it is according to his publisher and not New York Times. Should it be rewritten? Edwige9 (talk) 13:10, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 one external links on Chetan Bhagat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111104154659/http://ekendraonline.com:80/edu/chetan-bhagat-in-kathmandu-rejuvenates-youth-potential-81.html to http://ekendraonline.com/edu/chetan-bhagat-in-kathmandu-rejuvenates-youth-potential-81.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110305044608/http://www.cio.in:80/idm/8909 to http://www.cio.in/idm/8909
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100323050906/http://www.staranchorhunt.com:80/judges.html to http://staranchorhunt.com/judges.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:49, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chetan Bhagat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20120716161535/http://search.time.com/results.html?N=0&Nty=1&Ntt=chetan+bhagat&x=0&y=0&p=0&cmd=tags&srchCat=Full+Archive to http://search.time.com/results.html?N=0&Nty=1&Ntt=chetan+bhagat&x=0&y=0&p=0&cmd=tags&srchCat=Full+Archive

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 13:44, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Chetan Bhagat contested the claims - https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170426/jsp/frontpage/story_148369.jsp (2402:3A80:E29:FCC:9C66:AEC9:5200:371 (talk) 07:59, 4 July 2018 (UTC)) shouldn't that be given in the article too. Otherwise, it will be a one sided allegation (2402:3A80:E29:FCC:9C66:AEC9:5200:371 (talk) 07:59, 4 July 2018 (UTC))

Please verify Ketan Bhagat
Partially copied from this page.Xx236 (talk) 11:39, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

this page is not existing, then how can we verify it (111.92.29.198 (talk) 16:28, 27 June 2018 (UTC))

don't you all think we should start a page of Ketan Bhagat and then add content to it ? (112.133.236.197 (talk) 08:19, 24 July 2018 (UTC))