Talk:Chew on This

Untitled
Would the second paragraph of the Plot Summary merit a Neutrality Disputed header? Bmroute (talk) 23:17, 7 October 2008 (UTC) tx —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.246.114.136 (talk) 22:04, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Picture?
Surely a picture and infobox would be nice additions... Chevy monte  carlo  - alt 13:24, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Publication details??
A section of "Publication details" appears to me to constitute "article padding". Is there really nothing more to be said beyond the lead paragraph and synopsis? Most WP book articles do not suffer from the absence of such trivia. How about: 1. Age groups this "younger readers" oriented book is intended for. 2. Reception of this book by the news media and literature reviewing organizations. 3. An example of an illustration from the book, or even a mention as to whether the book is illustrated, and the artist, if there is one.

--Quisqualis (talk) 21:47, 24 December 2016 (UTC)