Talk:Chiasm (anatomy)

AfC review

 * I believe this article is independently notable
 * No quick fail criteria evident
 * No copyvio identified

Article accepted.--Tom (LT) (talk) 07:07, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Major restructuring
I did some major restructuring and editing of the page. Thank you, for your quick first review of the page and many thanks for your feedback! Further comments and help are very welcome. Marci68 (talk) 18:48, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the ping. Great to have another editor around.--Tom (LT) (talk) 23:23, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Have made some edits to make this article more standard in formatting and updated the navbox. In general, only the initial mention of the article is bold, or any terms that redirect to an article. The rest of the articles don't usually use too much italic or bold (also, your writing is clear enough without these). It is much more difficult to understand text when the cranial nerve numbers are mentioned after every nerve, so this has been deprecated on this site - there is no real need for tat here if you're linking to the article. --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:38, 3 January 2020 (UTC)