Talk:Chibi-Robo! (video game)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 00:58, 9 May 2011 (UTC)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * The infobox references for its releases could be replaced with a single GameFAQs link, which is considered reliable for that information and reduce the number of individual references used. Additionally, while I'm sure that Dock on that forum is reliable for the contents of the strangely cut-off interview on Cubed3. If an archiveurl cannot be made or a different reference substituted for it, I would suggest removing the content, as helpful as it is to the article.
 * Good work on that. In the future (or immediately if you'd like), you could also try to contact Cubed3 and inform them of the problem. It's fairly interesting information and would be a shame to lose it.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * The gameplay image does not seem appropriate for use; while it is demonstrative of the gameplay and HUD, I believe that it would be best for it to not use the post-game HUD (with the infinite symbols). The fair use rationales are a bit weak too; the Gameplay image should also mention the HUD. The third image has somewhat a weak rationale, as the image does not seem to have many distinguishing characteristics that set it apart from what it looks like now, besides the HUD, perspective, and the cursor.
 * I also forgot to mention that you should directly source the article where the image comes from, so that readers can understand how it's used in the article.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * The gameplay image does not seem appropriate for use; while it is demonstrative of the gameplay and HUD, I believe that it would be best for it to not use the post-game HUD (with the infinite symbols). The fair use rationales are a bit weak too; the Gameplay image should also mention the HUD. The third image has somewhat a weak rationale, as the image does not seem to have many distinguishing characteristics that set it apart from what it looks like now, besides the HUD, perspective, and the cursor.
 * I also forgot to mention that you should directly source the article where the image comes from, so that readers can understand how it's used in the article.


 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: