Talk:Chicago Limited (DLW train)

rename?
If this train was operated by the Lackawanna and the Michigan Central, then it was not a New York Central train. Unless the NYC took it over perhaps this article should be renamed. The dab page Chicago Limited has some listings of other companies that operated trains with the same name. Perhaps this article should be Chicago Limited (DLW&MC train) instead. Pedro Xing (talk) 02:34, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Perhaps a better rename would be Chicago Limited (DL&W-MC train). Your suggestion seems to imply that it was owned by a single railroad, rather than two of them. -User:DanTD (talk) 13:08, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
 * I opt for DLW train and will move it to Chicago Limited (DLW train) for this reason: in the MCR's own timetable, the route and times appear as #17 the Wolverine. The name Chicago Limited does not appear when surveying the MCR timetables from 1932, 1933 and 1938.Dogru144 (talk) 03:34, 16 April 2022 (UTC)