Talk:Chicago and North Western Transportation Company

Left-hand running
Was there a reason that the CNW ran on the left?

--N9jig (talk) 23:52, 12 January 2015 (UTC)When the tracks were built the stations were all on one side. When a second track was built later the new track was on the opposite side as the depot, but since passengers wait for the train in the station in the morning the trains were run on the left side so they didn't have to cross over an active track to access their inbound trains.

There was a myth out there that it was due to British capital investors but that has been debunked.

Joint passenger operations with UP
I just reverted an anon's edit that changed the end of the joint passenger train operations back twenty years, and that claimed Milwaukee Road was created in 1955. The Milwaukee Road did run some joint passenger trains with UP, but the railroad was not created in 1955. It may be that some of the service was shifted to Milwaukee Road (I'll have to check my references again), but it was my understanding that CNW held onto the majority of passenger services that it started with until Amtrak's creation. Slambo (Speak) 17:51, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

True, the MILW didn't take over all of the CNW trains but it did take over the "City" runs in 1955. Schnauf 15:58, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Powder River Basin
I'm thinking about adding this section- what do you guys think?

''Powder River Basin The CNW originally planned to use its "Cowboy Line" as the connection to the Powder River Basin, however the poor condition of its trackage forced the railroad to look elsewhere for a way to move coal. A connection to Union Pacific was built at South Morrill, NE, and the new partner loaned funds to help CNW upgrade their Powder River Lines (as well as to purchase parts of BN's for joint control) In 1984, the first CNW coal train from the Powder River Basin departed with SD40-2 6935 in the lead and two UP units assisting. The volume of coal traffic soon exploded, and the 450 millionth ton mark was reached in 1994.'' Schnauf
 * Sounds good. I'll see if I can dig up the issue of North Western Lines again that covered the construction of the PRB connections.  Slambo (Speak)  16:59, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * That looks correct. I have a book here, "Main Lines: Rebirth of the North American Railroads, 1970-2002" that covers that  (Except for the serial number of the lead locomotive.)  Here's the citation:


 * —Preceding unsigned comment added by Elkman (talk • contribs)

GA Re-Review and In-line citations
Members of the WikiProject Good articles are in the process of doing a re-review of current Good Article listings to ensure compliance with the standards of the Good Article Criteria. (Discussion of the changes and re-review can be found here). A significant change to the GA criteria is the mandatory use of some sort of in-line citation (In accordance to WP:CITE) to be used in order for an article to pass the verification and reference criteria. Currently this article does not include in-line citations. It is recommended that the article's editors take a look at the inclusion of in-line citations as well as how the article stacks up against the rest of the Good Article criteria. GA reviewers will give you at least a week's time from the date of this notice to work on the in-line citations before doing a full re-review and deciding if the article still merits being considered a Good Article or would need to be de-listed. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact us on the Good Article project talk page or you may contact me personally. On behalf of the Good Articles Project, I want to thank you for all the time and effort that you have put into working on this article and improving the overall quality of the Wikipedia project. LuciferMorgan 00:18, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Good Article Review
This article is currently under Good Article Review. LuciferMorgan 00:41, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Renaming
I'm not happy with the renaming of this article from Chicago and North Western Railway to Chicago and North Western Transportation Company. It seems to me that it's more appropriate to use the name the company had for most of its existence — the name by which it's most widely known. What was the reasoning behind this move? Kevin Forsyth (talk) 14:24, 18 October 2008 (UTC)


 * I don't have a dog in this fight, but I agree. Casey (talk) 18:15, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Logo color
The CNW logo was not blue and red. Can someone correct the logo color? 65.25.213.207 (talk) 04:43, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Merger proposal
The article Chicago and North Western Historical Society was slated to deletion but due to the consensus, it can instead be merged to Chicago and North Western Transportation Company. TheGGoose (talk) 13:20, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * There are no sources in the current article. What would be merged? Mackensen (talk) 13:22, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Haven't you read the deletion discussion? The society article would be merged to the company article, at least trimming it into a paragraph perhaps. TheGGoose (talk) 13:47, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, I did. In fact, I passed on closing it. I'm simply dubious that it's worth a mention and there's enough unreferenced material in the article as-is. I think an external link is sufficient. Mackensen (talk) 14:10, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Ball and Bar logo
In the Additional notes section is the comment, "In 1891, the CNW adopted the infamous 'ball and bar' logo..." which slightly confuses me. I was aware the logo was famous, but not so aware of its infamy; and there is no reference that expounds on that. Is anyone knowledgeable about that, or is it likely just a mis-use of the term "infamous?" Mike in IL (talk) 12:35, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Iowa Southern Railway
Iowa Southern Railway page redirects to this CNW page here, but no mention here. !945 Official Guide shows an electrified line running south from Albia to Centerville, with extension to Appanoose. Casey (talk) 18:13, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chicago and North Western Transportation Company. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080511213831/http://www.midcontinent.org/collectn/steam/cnw1385.html to http://midcontinent.org/collectn/steam/cnw1385.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:06, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Name of page- should be Chicago and North Western Railway
The name of the page should be Chicago and North Western Railway. The railroad was renamed back to its original name- Chicago and North Western Railway in 1994.

This is what happened: In May 1994, the Chicago and North Western Transportation Company was renamed back to its original name, Chicago and North Western Railway and the Chicago and North Western Holdings Corporation was renamed to the second Chicago and North Western Transportation Company.

I added this information to the page already with references Granthew (talk) 02:28, 8 September 2017 (UTC).