Talk:Chicken party

I was just working the WP:CSD category when I spotted this one. I don't think it's CSDable any more so I've put a hangon on it. There is enough cited material here and content that it feels like either a keeper, or perhaps a mergeto Rainbow party (sexuality)... Suggest we AfD it if we must. Note, I have little interest or expertise in the topic and am not a good source for article improvements. I just found it.  + + Lar: t/c 04:04, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

I too would suggest a merge into Rainbow party (sexuality) because the definition of it is already in the aforementioned article. I have no particular interest or expertise either. It just seems a definition rather than noteworthy enough for it's own article.-- Dakota ~ 04:14, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
 * It's not a rainbow party really, so it shouldn't be merged there, unless you want to do a completely new thing "List of speculated teen sex parties." Anyway, I removed the tags.  Lots of good articles get tagged by people who don't understand the criteria; not everyone of them needs to go to AfD. CanadianCaesar Cæsar is turn’d to hear 04:53, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

I only moved the definition there to protect my work in case it was deleted. I dont think it should be merged, they are not the same, and each have their own references. I was watching Primetime on ABC and heard the references and didn't know what they were. I added "hooky party" at rainbow party since I didn't have any external references when I wrote the definition. I think it deserves its own entry now that I have the ACLU story. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk • contribs) 19 May 2006