Talk:Chideock

unsourced statement
Any reason why I should not delete: "It is little known that some regard Bristol as a suburb of Chideock, for obscure and perhaps tenuous reasons. Research is ongoing as to the economic and cultural links between the village and the largest city in the southwest region." Brownturkey (talk) 21:48, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I've deleted it - it was added on 31 May 2010 by an IP, who seems to have been making some POV points about village politics. I've removed some other claims as well. PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 03:44, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The statements were made by me, and yes I was making a point, BUT the issue being a suburb of Bristol relied on the claim of a prominent resident who claimed to be born and bred, even though hailing from Bristol and only being a recent retiree to village. If you want a debate conger1216@hotmail.co.uk — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.41.26.125 (talk) 15:55, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Climate data
An unregistered editor keeps adding climate data to the article, but I have removed it because it isn't clear where the data has been gathered. The unregistered editor has provided a source for the data - http://www.myweather2.com - but I am yet to be convinced that that source can be considered reliable, and anyway it also very clearly states that "The climate profile is taken from closest available data source to North Chideock", which is not the same as stating the data was gathered actually in Chideock. It is quite likely the data was gathered at a weather station such as on the Isle of Portland or at Yeovilton in Somerset, and because of this I consider it misleading to the reader to present the info in the article as if it applied specifically to Chideock. In addition, some of the text added by the unregistered editor was not supported by the source - for example, the claim that Chideock is one of the sunniest places in the UK. This statement may be correct, but it is not supported by the source. PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 00:00, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chideock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130121174035/http://www.thisisdorset.co.uk/Light-end-tunnel-Dorset-road-campaign/story-12700984-detail/story.html to http://www.thisisdorset.co.uk/Light-end-tunnel-Dorset-road-campaign/story-12700984-detail/story.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:56, 1 December 2017 (UTC)