Talk:Chigua

Chigua is no more a valid genus
A recent revision (Lindstrom 2009) sunk the genus Chigua and placed C. restrepoi and C. bernalii in the genus Zamia. It also regarded the two described species of Chigua as being a single entity. --Esculapio (talk) 19:24, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Esculapio Careful with the terminology, please. The name is still valid, as the word "valid" is defined in botanical nomenclature, although it is no longer accepted by current authors. The Kew World Checklist agrees that the genus should be merged into Zamia.Joseph Laferriere (talk) 16:31, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Chigua. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050301022859/http://plantnet.rbgsyd.gov.au:80/cgi-bin/taxon.pl?name=Chigua to http://plantnet.rbgsyd.gov.au/cgi-bin/taxon.pl?name=Chigua
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061228144956/http://www.horticulturalconsultants.com:80/cycad/chigua.html to http://www.horticulturalconsultants.com/cycad/chigua.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:47, 22 November 2016 (UTC)