Talk:Child Support Agency/to do


 * POV check - as rewrite was mostly by one author. If other editors are happy, please remove this.
 * Existing sections:
 * Calculations, do these need clarifying? CLARIFIED
 * Sytems, background (I believe it's by EDS, same people that are doing ID cards) INFO NOT AVAILABLE
 * Critisms - Surely there are some positive comments in the news? NOT REALLY
 * New Sections:
 * Amount of money going through the system DEBT AND BACKLOG COVERED
 * Payment methods,and breakdown, e.g. salary deductions. SEE "CALCULATIONS" ABOVE
 * Disagreements - e.g. DNA testing requirements? (ref case where man was proven not to be the father, after paying for years ) INCLUDED
 * Stats - breakdown of male/female being parent with care relavent? NOT RELEVANT - The vast majority were men, I would estimate 95% male NRCs

Overall, I think the non-critism sections need expanding to avoid the article coming acorss as too negitive. Unfortunately, references for critism are easier to find, although the two (old and new) leaflets have a lot of background