Talk:Child pornography laws in Canada

Specificness
It looks like a deal of this is recycled material originally from the loli and later moved to the 'cp depicting minors' articles, if there is going to be predominant focus in cases relating to anime illustrations then I think it would be good to mention that in the intro and perhaps reflect it in the title, as the title currently is more broadly-worded than what its content contains. Tyciol (talk) 06:17, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

New case?
I was reading that a pair of twins got arrested in Canada somewhere for possession of shota? Haven't found the article, but if true it's the first development I've heard of in Canada since 3 years of Sousa visiting the year after Chin's problem. 99.238.89.121 (talk) 09:16, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Out of Date/Incorrect Information
The information on this page is largely out-dated and incorrect. When I get a chance this week, I will update it with the new cases and minimum penalties. There are also new procedures for invoking exceptions.Billturner1983 (talk) 23:12, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Child pornography laws in Canada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080430210752/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2001/2001scc2/2001scc2.html to http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2001/2001scc2/2001scc2.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927130943/http://www.ynot.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=news_article&sid=9883 to http://www.ynot.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=news_article&sid=9883

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:43, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Legal status of psilocybin mushrooms which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 01:46, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 8 June 2017

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: TBD. Redundant. See Talk:Legal_status_of_psilocybin_mushrooms В²C ☎ 18:12, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Child pornography laws in Canada → Legality of child pornography in Canada – Several different formats exist for the titles of articles regarding the legality of a particular thing. I believe that all of these should be consistent with each other and that that format should be "Legality of X" (instead of "Legal status of X, Laws regarding X, etc.) Others have noted that "legality" is a more common term when referring to whether something is legal or illegal than "legal status". Michipedian (talk) 02:03, 8 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.