Talk:Children's hospice

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 10 January 2019 and 18 April 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): LuzRaudales. Peer reviewers: Rayal021, Lgonz498.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:27, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Peer Review
Very interesting topic. I'd like to see how the business ethics side to this would tie in. Are there children being sent to hospices solely for profit? I know that there are crazy cases out there. I saw that there was a reference to children charities, perhaps there's some more information through that link. I'm not quite sure where to find your edits, but I would add more to the intro. The material looks clean and concise, but I sense myself looking for more. It's very much like a "list." Nevertheless, loved the topic, just waiting to see the connection between the business side of things! Rayal021 (talk) 03:18, 4 April 2019 (UTC)User:Rayal021 4/3/2019

Individual
I've noticed that there aren't many pages on individual hospices (I've only found two so far). I'm new to editing but would be happy to do a list of UK children's hospices with links to the appropriate external pages. I'd be interested in writing pages for the three hospices I'm familiar with (none of which have pages). Is this something that would be useful? I'd also be happy to reword the tone of this page, but I'm not sure what specifically is inappropriate Kebl2693 23:34, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * What is inappropriate is that this page is little more than a directory. Delete the organisations and provide instead some information on how hospice differs for kids vs adults, history of the children's hospice movement, and any pertinent cultural issues. Also add links to WP pages re respite care, visiting nurses, etc. --Una Smith (talk) 20:26, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Linking as a directory is a valid enough way to begin. We can use sources that have sites because they are good references. Tyciol (talk) 21:49, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 one external links on Children's hospice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716111622/http://www.dagen.se/dagen/article.aspx?id=224722 to http://www.dagen.se/dagen/article.aspx?id=224722
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131002071316/http://www.4ni.co.uk/northern_ireland_news.asp?id=12432 to http://www.4ni.co.uk/northern_ireland_news.asp?id=12432
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130917221107/http://www.szememfenye.hu:80/rovat/dori-haz to http://www.szememfenye.hu/rovat/dori-haz

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:49, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Children's hospice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928115547/http://www.chionline.org/events/resources/101305%20CHI%20Thompson%20Award%20Release.pdf to http://www.chionline.org/events/resources/101305%20CHI%20Thompson%20Award%20Release.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070724043109/http://www.chionline.org/whoweare/ to http://www.chionline.org/whoweare/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130917221107/http://www.szememfenye.hu/rovat/dori-haz to http://www.szememfenye.hu/rovat/dori-haz

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:48, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

"In the early 1970s many experts realized that the medical education was not designed and physicians were not trained to deal with ethical issues associated with new technologies such as mechanical ventilation, dialysis and transplantation. After the creation of such technology kidney failure was sure to be fatal, now physicians were starting to make choices about where, when, and how someone could die." Wouldn't it be before such technology? I'm not familiar enough with the source to edit the claim, but it seems nonsensical as-is. 6DollarSuit (talk) 01:35, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: UCSF SOM Inquiry In Action-- Wikipedia Editing 2022
— Assignment last updated by Arth25 (talk) 04:57, 15 September 2022 (UTC)