Talk:Chilean video game content rating system

Do not add comparisons to other countries
Please do not add comparisons to other countries' systems. Thank you. (talk) 7:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Why? The Resolution 5,733 exempted, September, 2014 explitly mentions those equivalents. --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Information orange.svg are in violation of WP:TRIVIA and WP:NOTDATABASE when you add such indiscriminate information like that. Several other film, TV and video game ratings/classification articles had been, at times, plagued by this irrelevant trivia that must be avoided, per the two guidelines. Loyalmoonie (talk) 14:20, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Of course this is relevant, for this specific case, as the cited Resolution mentions that, therefore, is part of the information of the classification. This is not what I invented but what say the laws/decrees, and it is properly sourced. Also, don't add commented text to the article itself; consensus should be reached here. --Amitie 10g (talk) 15:59, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

DISPUTE
At times, I felt best to clean up some of the video game, film and television ratings/classification articles to make sure that there are no lists of films, shows, games, etc., and/or that users put in comparisons to other countries' rating/classification systems (including, but not limited to, adding "this rating is similar to X-country's rating", etc.), as such edits seem to violate WP:TRIVIA and/or WP:NOTDATABASE. Currently, I am in a mild dispute with Amitie 10g on this matter.

I have been cleaning up some of the related articles for the above reasons, and came across this article having comparisons to other systems by writing them in a table. I removed that and added a hidden notice to warn would-be editors to refrain from adding such unnecessary information. I have had to revert some edits on other articles in the past at times because I thought that I was cleaning up the irrelevant trivia to comply with WP:TRIVIA and/or WP:NOTDATABASE. Unfortunately, Amitie 10g does not seem to see it that way, and decided to attack my good will in cleaning up the article by accusing me of violating WP:POINT in the edit summary.

At no time was I/am I ever disrupting Wikipedia to make a point; I was just doing what I thought was best by cleaning up the article to comply with WP:TRIVIA and/or WP:NOTDATABASE...that is not being disruptive, but Amitie 10g seems to think that I was, and even if the comparisons were properly sourced, however, they still violate WP:TRIVIA and WP:NOTDATABASE, and should be avoided per those two guidelines. Loyalmoonie (talk) 00:17, 1 April 2024 (UTC)