Talk:China–India relations

Start class to GA
There is a lot of useful text and information in the article, though some work needs to be done to reach B or even C class. This is Start class: The article has a usable amount of good content but is weak in several areas. Quality of the prose is not always encyclopedic (too many short paragraphs, occasionally one sentence paragraphs - needs copyediting, especially as regards flow of prose). A number of aspects of Manual of Style need compliance, particularly layout (too many very short sections), and use of images (added in a haphazard manner). Frequently, the referencing is inadequate, and some statements have been tagged as needing sources since May 2020. Too much information appears to have been added piecemeal, without overall shape and control. Some sections are very dense - often with shopping lists of information with the only apparent organisation being date order. I think this article would make a good project for working on to bring to GA level, and I note in the edit history several editors (such as User:FacetsOfNonStickPans) who are quite capable of doing that. Good luck to those willing to take this article on. SilkTork (talk) 14:57, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Lack of Recognition of Current Ties
Though this article provides a lot of information about historical China-India relations, I feel like it does a poor job at communicating new developments in international policy. For example, it does not cite UNCLOS violations in the SCS as being a key trigger for India's reactionary agenda. Further, there is little information about public opinion beyond just one example of how the Chinese people viewed India in 2008 and one in 2014 which does not necessarily reflect current opinion after significant expansionary moves China has taken through the Belt and Road Initiative. I think such details would be important to properly represent current foreign policy and relations between the two nations.--Arushilahiri (talk) 21:02, 8 April 2023 (UTC) Arushilahiri (talk) 21:01, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Sino–Indian relations or China–India relations
According to the unified format of Wikipedia, it should be China–India relations Бмхүн (talk) 06:20, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:38, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
 * India China Locator.png

Pronunciation of 身毒 (Yuandu)
Here it's written that ancient India was called Shendu, but in Ancient China the pronunciation of the characters 身毒 was Yuandu and not Shendu. 46.182.107.26 (talk) 10:09, 19 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Interesting, it does appear that 身 was pronounced or  in this compound word.  Remsense  诉  10:17, 19 April 2024 (UTC)