Talk:China Anne McClain/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk · contribs) 04:41, 14 April 2020 (UTC)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.


 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall: Fail
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall: Fail
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

There are too many problems which need to be addressed for this to pass. Way more information is needed and everything needs to be cited to reliable sources. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 04:41, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
 * (This was moved from a discussion with the nominator on my talk page).... Take a look at how detailed and well-sourced Beyoncé's article is while McClain has many sentences without any reference (and some are dead) and very little detail. For example, the sentence "McClain appeared on ABC's Sing Your Face Off television show, winning the show's first season" is unsourced and can go into much more detail. When did she sign onto the show, was her singing praised, were the ratings good? It could probably be its own paragraph with how much information you can describe about her and the show. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 23:02, 14 April 2020 (UTC)