Talk:China University of Petroleum

RfC: One or two articles?
In January 2014, user:Narjuko split this article into two new articles (China University of Petroleum (Beijing) and China University of Petroleum (Huadong)) without any explanation. This page was redesigned as disambiguation page. In May 2014, the SPA re-merged these article by copy-paste moves, again without any explanation. The question is: Beagel (talk) 19:28, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Should there be a single article covering both universities or should there be two separate articles, one for each of university?

Survey
If they have enough notability to be alone, then two articles would be best. If they are very similar and a lot of connections can be made to adequately inform the user of the two universities together, then probably one article would be best. It seems to be though that the one article is working on its own at the moment. --JustBerry (talk) 23:35, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Currently the article is so short that I don't think it justifies splitting.--Salix alba (talk): 09:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I agree. Once there is enough significant content, the split should be made by consensus. – FenixFeather  (talk)(Contribs) 21:45, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Given it is basically the same organization with two similar campuses, keeping it all together is certainly more helpful for the reader (and the writer too). - Nabla (talk) 10:22, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Proposed merge of China University of Petroleum (Beijing) into China University of Petroleum
There is much overlap between these two articles, with some aspects covered better in each. I see no reason to have separate articles for the different campuses. MB 03:14, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Support. It has been split and merged previously and the existing consensus is to have all information in one article. It is questionable why the separate article China University of Petroleum (Beijing) was re-created in the first place. Beagel (talk) 20:24, 16 November 2021 (UTC)