Talk:Chinese People's Association for Friendship with Foreign Countries

Malicious Deletion Activity by User:Amigao
Committee of China's Conference for the Defense of World Peace was the predecessor organization of the Chinese People's Association for Friendship with Foreign Countries and part of the subsequent merger. Please do not remove history to fulfill your anti-China political agenda. TinaLees-Jones (talk) 14:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)


 * I try to understand your political activities with the best of intentions, but the obvious anti-Chinese malice that exists in all the edits about you and the objective historical presentation by deleting entries. There are many reports about you on google, I hope you love your own feathers. TinaLees-Jones (talk) 14:18, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I had already made my claim on the talk page before you deleted it, you should have properly replied to that claim first before maliciously deleting it. Your anti-Chinese stance is offensive. TinaLees-Jones (talk) 14:21, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
 * You need a WP:RS to back up the claim that it was a predecessor organization. Otherwise, it's just WP:OR and will be removed. - Amigao (talk) 14:19, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
 * There are already four sources within that paragraph to support the information, and the combined information is clearly explained in subsequent paragraphs. TinaLees-Jones (talk) 14:22, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
 * The first paragraph should clearly state that it is a successor to said organization and have WP:RSes to back up such a statement. At present, none of that is there. - Amigao (talk) 14:25, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
 * You should probably also review WP:SYNTH. - Amigao (talk) 14:27, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
 * In other words, the removed paragraph does not logically connect with the rest of the History section. There should be some phrasing backed up with a specific WP:RS that states that it is a successor organization. - Amigao (talk) 14:33, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
 * If you think you can achieve anti-Chinese goals by deleting, then you keep deleting yours and I'll keep contributing knowledge. TinaLees-Jones (talk) 14:34, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
 * What sophistry. I've labeled both paragraphs in Chinese, can't you see the relationship? TinaLees-Jones (talk) 14:36, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you for adding some necessary context on the relationship. It's coming together better now. - Amigao (talk) 14:40, 29 May 2024 (UTC)