Talk:Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen

"Controversy"
I don't think the section "Controversy" is important and objective enough to appear on a Wiki page. It's not a "Controversy" but some very subjective review. I tried to delete it as per WP:NPOV. However, User:Citobun insisted on pinning this non-sense section and accused me of disruptive editing. The source is biased, as explained by this review.

It seems that the user is personally negatively affected by the establishment of this institution and tries to draw negative editorial bias on this Wiki page violating WP:NPOV, as shown by the edit history. --118.163.201.6 (talk) 03:50, 10 October 2017 (UTC)


 * On the contrary, it seems that this page attracts users who do not understand that NPOV entails explaining all notable aspects of a subject, including potentially negative aspects. The "nonsense" content in the Controversy section has been covered extensively in Hong Kong media and is reliably sourced, so there is no valid rationale to whitewash it. That you tried to "delete it as per WP:NPOV" reveals a lack of understanding of that policy. Citobun (talk) 03:59, 10 October 2017 (UTC)


 * There is the question of weight, and also of using the word 'controversy'. Is there more than one source? Does the source use the word controversy? I'm re-titling the section for now. LK (talk) 04:05, 18 March 2018 (UTC)