Talk:Chinese nationality law/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ex Parte (talk · contribs) 20:56, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Opening statement
Hi, I'll be beginning the process of reviewing this article fully soon. I've conducted my initial WP:GAFAIL check and found nothing precluding a full review. As such, I'll begin the process of a full review soon. You can refer to my findings from the initial WP:GAFAIL inspection here:

I look forward to conducting the full review for this article and working with the article's contributors on any improvements which might be needed to bring it to GA level. I anticipate a speedy confirmation process. -- Ex Parte talk 20:56, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Closing statement
I'd like to start by saying congratulations! Bringing an article to GA level is a lot of work, and I commend your accomplishment. If you intend to pursue further elevation, these are some areas you could focus on:


 * I'm not a huge fan of the current headings layout. The headings appear a little bit repetitive, with the constant trichotomy of Mainland China, Hong Kong & Macau, and Taiwan.  While there's obviously a good reason for breaking it down this way, stylistically it could use a little bit of improvement before it would meet, for instance, FA standards.

But, regardless of what you decide to do moving forward, great work on this!

✅


 * Thanks for reviewing! Could you manually add the GA template to the article itself? Seems Legobot is broken again.
 * To your comment on the section headings, I also wasn't really sure how to name them and I agree it's a bit awkward as it is now. Will change if I think of something different. Horserice (talk) 02:28, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Added the topicon and sounds good. Congrats again!  -- Ex Parte  talk 17:06, 14 September 2020 (UTC)