Talk:Chitty Chitty Bang Bang (car)

There are a number of replica cars out there, including the one depicted in the photo on this page as of this writing.Unsinkablerob (talk) 15:20, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

"Gen"
Is this taken from the old slang word for "knowledge" or "information"?, eg. "I've got the latest gen" / "The gen on this is ... " Danceswithzerglings (talk) 17:14, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 one external links on Chitty Chitty Bang Bang (car). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
 * Attempted to fix sourcing for http://chittygen11.com/index2.html
 * Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.chittygen11.com/appearance.htm
 * Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.chittychittybangbang.net/about.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 00:23, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chitty Chitty Bang Bang (car). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151107030403/http://www.dezercollection.com/museums/hollywood-cars-of-the-stars/ to http://www.dezercollection.com/museums/hollywood-cars-of-the-stars/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:29, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Debate
Part of the actual article sounds like it's debating itself. The last paragraph under the "Replica Cars" section reads, in part:

> "Actually the Garofalo replica lacks in several specific and iconic features... Tony's [car] is a fantastic replica and work of art, but don't claim it to be an exacting detail to the original when significant features are easily recognized as not accurate."

I think the entire last paragraph should be removed. If whoever wrote that section wants to debate, isn't that what the this talk section is for? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saundecp (talk • contribs) 19:13, 24 August 2018 (UTC)