Talk:Cholla (horse)

Tone of article
The tone of this article isn't very "encyclopedic." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.202.108.210 (talk) 15:21, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Nothing's really cited, and it reads more like young adult fiction than an encyclopedia article. Especially the dubious comments that the horse's technique is somehow fundamentally different from elephant art could use sourcing. (That's not to say that a painting horse isn't amazing, of course, but its article should be factual.) Saltwater Rat (talk) 02:24, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for your comments, I'll be pleased to be helped making this article more interesting. There was a bibliography section in a previous version, but it looks like it has been cancelled. I will add some more references :) --Globe.explorer (talk) 22:37, 13 October 2009 (UTC)