Talk:Chris Bosh/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

This article has been reviewed as part of WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards,--Jackyd101 (talk) 10:46, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Prose is good, probably an 8/10, although there are a few places where it has a touch of hyperbole ("anointed" as captain?).


 * It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
 * It is stable.
 * It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
 * a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * Overall:
 * a Pass/Fail:
 * Thanks for the GAR. Chensiyuan (talk) 14:59, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the GAR. Chensiyuan (talk) 14:59, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

need to talk about extreme resemblence to a velociraptor —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.230.12.123 (talk) 19:10, 16 April 2011 (UTC)