Talk:Chris Traeger/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  Rcej (Robert) –  talk  03:16, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Nice job! I'm thinking; would not the subsections Second season and Third season, since they deal with Chris' growth, be more associated with Development than with  Character Biography ? :-)  Rcej (Robert) –  talk  06:21, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I really feel rather strongly that the structure works better this way. "Development" really refers more to the behind-the-scenes conception, casting, writing, establishment, etc. of the character, whereas the stuff described in "season two" and "season three" is a more "in universe"-style of what happens with Chris' character within the show. That, to me, makes more sense as part of his character biography than the Development section. But if you also feel strongly, we can discuss this more if you like. —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  06:33, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * We will go with you on that :)  Rcej (Robert) –  talk  05:22, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Please note these two minor additions. Sorry they came after your review began! —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  21:37, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * No prob! And everything is in the green, so I can "LITerally" pass the article now! ;)  Rcej (Robert) –  talk  05:22, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your efforts, as always! —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  06:54, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Results of review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Chris Traeger passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: