Talk:Chrissy Gephardt

PROD
She is definitely notable by WP:GNG: — Preceding unsigned comment added by TonyTheTiger (talk • contribs) 15:07, 24 February 2013
 * 1) http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2003/11/13/chrissy-gephardt-stumps-for-fathers-economic/
 * 2) http://books.google.com/books?id=TWUEAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA28&lpg=PA28&dq=Chrissy+Gephardt+%22The+advocate%22&source=bl&ots=ltFhsY72c5&sig=uIJxBBpw8kZXsYGIU6xVNuIUL0A&hl=en&sa=X&ei=3ykqUce1PIGQ9QT66YCoCg&ved=0CDsQ6AEwAQ
 * 3) http://www.advocate.com/news/2004/08/17/other-presidential-race
 * 4) http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Gephardt%27s+gay+daughter%3a+Chrissy+Gephardt+is+revving+up+to+solicit...-a0105367646
 * 5) http://calendar.theadvocate.com/movies/show/10953-for-the-bible-tells-me-so
 * 6) http://calendar.theadvocate.com/reviews/show/13833-review-for-the-bible-tells-me-so
 * 7) http://www.nytimes.com/1997/09/21/style/weddings-christine-gephardt-and-marc-leibole.html
 * 1, 2 and 4 are more suitably mentioned in her fathers' article, as it is her campaigning on his behalf. 3 is perhaps the best argument for her notability (although only just, in my opinion). 5 is her name on a list of people involved with 'For the Bible Tells Me So", so is not sufficient to establish notability; 6 is a review of it, but is not indepth coverage of her; 7 is a "routine announcement" - if she is notable, it is useful to add to the article, but in and of itself it does not indicate her notability (again, it is about someone who is related to a notable person). As such, I would argue that this does not show that she is definitely notable, and will consider over the next few days whether to take this to Articles for deletion or not. Thanks for giving me something to think about!  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 21:07, 24 February 2013 (UTC)