Talk:Christian Jürgensen Thomsen

Quality of article
Bottom line: poor.

However, the picture is very nice. The article is poor because, first the English is not very good. Second, the archaeology is incomprehensible. Just because you are Danish does not make you an archaeologist. Third, there is little biography.

As a fourth point, this article was duplicated word for word in the Three-Age System article. I did not know that. I rewrote that article - am still rewriting - but had I known of this straight copy I would have been more severe on the other. I think now I will go back and change that section even more. Anyway it would be a shame not to have an article that does not live up to the fine picture. The light of knowledge shines from his eyes. I am not going to do this however as my time is limited. I encourage you to excellence. Onward and upward!Dave (talk) 19:30, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * You really are a smug asshole WP:DICK. And yes this is itself a personal attack Dick move, but you have worked hard to deserve it. You can have the article to yourself, I'll go to great lengths not to have to interact with you in the future. It is off my watchlist. Happy editing.·Maunus· ƛ · 21:22, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

--User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 01:40, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Wow. Classic example of poor wikipedia etiquette for a noob like me. Well done Maunus for making a great start in your second language. Shame some people can't criticise constructively. I'll have a go at improving it myself soon! PatHadley (talk) 14:08, 28 July 2011 (UTC)