Talk:Christianity, and Biblical adherance

Don't create a poorly written, inaccurate, POV article just because someone may not have "gotten their way" on another article (Criticisms of Christianity). Bad articles are bad articles. Don't mess up Wikipedia with more. KHM03 23:20, 12 December 2005 (UTC)


 * This isn't about that. See Talk:Criticism of Christianity. This is about stopping that article being a POV magnet, reducing its bloat factor, and putting things under neutral article headings that at least have a chance at eventually, after much editing, becoming "the perfect article". Clinkophonist 00:15, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

But your plan isn't something the WP community agreed to, and therefore you're going to get a lot of resistance, counter-edits, and redirects. You're making a much bigger POV mess. Your articles are far from neutral, they are filled with problems...inaccuracies and POV. Even the title of this article...the word is "adherence", not "adherance". Problems, problems, problems. Please just breathe, and recognize that others (like myself) disagree entirely with your approach. I am theologically and evangelical, yes, but I am not a conservative (there's a difference), and if you aren't convincing me, you're surely not getting very far. Rethink things. KHM03 02:23, 13 December 2005 (UTC)


 * See Talk:Criticism of Christianity. There were two agrees and no disagrees before I did this.
 * I apologise for the typo if that is the case. Clinkophonist 06:02, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Clearly there is plenty of disagreement now. Why keep reverting to your own versions when others (myself included) edit to remove POV? There's still critical info on these articles...just less of the extreme, unsourced, peripherally related stuff. KHM03 06:57, 14 December 2005 (UTC)